|
The
"cattle mutilation" syndrome is an UFO related
phenomenon characterized by the finding of dead mutilated
farm animals in isolated areas with no physical traces of
the responsible for the deaths, i.e., no foot prints, no
crushed grass, no tracks, no snow prints in winter.
It has been found that the body is totally drained of blood
and there are no trace of blood anywhere on the ground.
Incisions of different types are found on the bodies, all
so clear-cut that they would have to be done with advanced
technology, that didn't exist when the mutilations started,
before 1970.
Various body parts are found to be missing, normally, sensory
organs (eyes and internal ears), tongue, the glands of the
throat, mammary glands, sexual parts, navel, lower intestine,
excised in such ways that suggest the use of laser like
instruments and round sucking cups unknown to medicine.
From 1960 onward, rumors began to be heard about findings
of similarly mutilated human corpses, horror stories rapidly
dismissed as misinformation or sensationalist material.
This matter, generally considered to be of very bad taste,
surfaced again in 1988 when the Skywatch International open
list published a short text purported to be based on a secret
report relating the death of an Air Force Sgt (E-6) by the
name Jonathan P. Louette, abducted at the White Sands missile
test range in March of 1976.
According to the report, his nude body was found three days
later in the middle of the desert, horribly mutilated: the
tongue had been removed from the lower part of the jaw;
the eyes, removed; the genitalia and the anus, all the way
to the colon, excised, "as through a plug". The
autopsy report confirmed that the body had been completely
drained of blood.
The following year Donald Ecker, then responsible for the
Idaho MUFON Directory investigated the story of the finding
of a mutilated body in a remote place near Bliss area, Idaho,
with extensive mutilations in the face, and complete excision
of the sexual parts and other abdominal organs.
During the investigation Ecker found there was a generalized
and near absolute predisposition to repress the whole story,
including among ufologists, deeply divided between those
who see the extraterrestrials as harbingers of the New Age
and those who think they are nothing less than precursors
demons of the Apocalypse.
A
few years later there was the case of a similarly mutilated
body, occurred in 1994, in New Zealand, as reported by Karen
Lyster in http://www.reocities.com/CapitolHill/Congress/2301/humanmute.html
where Karen has been telling for a couple of years without
repercussions another disgusting story of a cored out rectum,
bloodless removal of sexual organs, and a vivid description
of the removal from the chest of very clean cookie cutter
pieces of flesh, around 2 inches in diameter, as they could
be evaluated from the photos (that she wasn't allowed to
keep) shown to her by a distressed Physician that wanted
to know her opinion about how similar the wounds were to
the cattle mutilations she had studied before.
The force of the taboo like willingness to deny the human
mutilations is so strong that even the extremely well researched
and conclusive investigation made in 1992 by Encarnacion
Zapata Garcia about the so called Guarapiranga Dam case,
in Brazil, seems like it never happened at all.
The story of this research was made public at the Internet
a few years ago by G. Cope Shellhorn, and soon was lost
in the noise.
What makes the Guarapiranga case absolutely special is that,
notwithstanding the fact that the body was discovered, like
the above mentioned, at an isolated place, it was found
at an small island inside a reservoir inside S. Paulo city,
one of the most modern, advanced, well developed cities
of the world, so a very short time after the body was found
it was examined by the proper detachment of the police department,
photographed from many angles and positions -- before and
after removal -- and later autopsied by forensic experts
whose report -- shown here and partially translated ahead
-- is a testimony to their bafflement by the strangeness
and inexplicability of the wounds inflicted upon the "murder
victim" they had been called to examine.
As a matter of fact, the same peculiar type of incisions
and excisions characteristic to cattle mutilation cases
were found all over the body: eyes and ears removed leaving
plug like holes, lips and flesh excised around the mandibles,
emptied mouth cavity, removal of sexual and intestinal parts...
___________________________________
OFFICIAL
AUTOPSY REPORT
From
the Legal Medicine Institute,
Scientific
Police Department,
S.Paulo
State Public Security Secretary, S.Paulo, Brazil
[A few items were blacked out to difficult the identification
of the victim, as asked by the family, but it has been possible
to verify the number of the criminal occurrence bulletin
(n. 5423/88, at the 25th police station), as well as the
number of the necrological report (n. 645/88 dated October,
03, 1988) and the name of the forensic medicine experts
that signed it: Dr Jorge Pereira de Oliveira and Dr Claudio
Roberto Luber]
___________________________________
PHOTO
#1
The
autopsy report states:
"EXTERNAL
EXAMINATION: We observed: 1) Cut off of the external ear
by a slanting incision, with hollowing of soft parts; 2)
removal of internal ear with indications of vital reaction;
3) enucleation of right and left ocular globes, with signs
of blood inside the cavities"
Summing up the removal or hollowing of other parts:
"16)
We observed the removal of the right and left orbital areas,
emptying of the mouth cavity, pharynx, oropharynx, neck,
right and left armpit area, abdomen, pelvic cavity, right
and left groin area".
PHOTO
#2
The
reference to "vital reaction" means that the wound
was inflicted upon a live body, not over a dead one. This
information is repeated in other parts of the report, for
example:
"8)
The left and the right armpit areas exhibit a circular discontinuity
[round hole], with 4 centimeters of diameter, with regular
borders and hollowing of soft parts, with signs of vital
reaction".
"21)
Absence of organs In the pelvis and abdominal cavity due
to the removal of all viscera, with signs of tearing and
vital reaction".
The most evident indication of vital reaction are the blue-black
haematomas (formed by the effusion of blood under the skin)
that can be clearly seen as a mask over the eyes, around
the ears, under the chin, as a rectangle around the hole
near the right armpit...
PHOTO
#3
...
and around similar holes with regular borders clearly seen
in the navel and at the thigh, near the left groin area,
that appears to have been produced by a "cookie cutter"
type of instrument.
PHOTO
#3a
An
extensive haematoma can also be observed throughout the
whole length of the very bruised, stretched penis, that
wasn't excised like the scrotum, but showed an enlarged
urethral channel (the red tip of which can be seen in the
photo) suggesting that the prostate gland was extracted
through it.
PHOTO
#4
The
official occurrence bulletin says the body was found simply
laying on the damp soil completely unbound, without signs
to have been previously chained or tied. [The piece of rope
found to be tied to the right arm during the autopsy was
used later, to fasten the body to the stretcher for removal,
as shown in the next photo]. There was no signs of fighting
nor any indication of the presence of other people in the
island.
The possibility that such a horrible butchery has been inflicted
upon a live victim, possibly paralyzed, brings up to the
mind the story related by Linda Moulton Howe about a mutilated
bull found in 1981, in Colorado, with dried traces of exudation
that trickled down along the muzzle from both its removed
eyes, in such a way that only could have occurred if it
were standing up, meaning that whoever excised its eyes,
removed its tongue, the sexual parts and the rectum, did
all that with the animal still alive, paralyzed and standing
over its own legs.
A very improbable and incredible thing, absolutely preposterous:
who in this world would be inhuman enough to do that to
a paralyzed, conscious animal?
And now, we have the official register of a human person
submitted to the same kind of treatment while still alive.
Would it be possible that he was conscious during the mutilation?
The sobering answer, given by the autopsy, is a resounding
yes!
"INTERNAL
EXAMINATION: ...after opening the cranial cavity using Griessinger
technique we found: 17) unimpaired skullcap; 18) cerebral
edema".
In a case like that, the presence of cerebral edema without
direct traumatic origin is a strong characteristic of an
agonizing death. In confirmation, the autopsy CONCLUSION
explicitly states as causa mortis (cause of the death):
"...acute
haemorhage in multiple traumatisms. There is a component
of causa mortis by vagus stimulation" [implying cardio-respiratory
arrest caused by extreme pain]. "The victim shows injuries
with vital reaction characteristics, i.e., there is the
component "torture". The suggested modus operandi
is: incisions in soft parts and natural orifices using sucking
devices".
PHOTOS
#5 and #5a
"23)
The thoracic viscera (i.e., non abdominal organs) were in
their normal place".
In spite of the fact that the vascular system was practically
drained, there was no signs of haemorrage in the body, or
in the site the body was found.
One of the MD that was part of the autopsy commented the
incongruity of the fact that the victim was wearing a short
(strangely free from a single drop of blood) when was found,
so whoever was responsible for the crime put on the short
back into the body after the carnage. He said that what
baffled him more than anything else was how could so much
muscular mass and lymph nodes be removed through small holes
(as can be clearly seen in Photos #3 and #4, near the armpit
and groin) without tearing apart the connecting tissue adhered
to the skin.
But all these are irrelevant details compared to the --
in this case -- impossible to deny reality of the mutilation
itself.
We have a body that was examined by professionals that would
certainly recognize the difference between randomly inflicted
wounds produced by animals, from deliberate, artificially
produced cuts, made by instruments. We have an official
document describing the autopsy. And this time the researcher
was allowed to keep the photos, at last.
All along the autopsy report, the artificiality and surgical
deliberation of the incisions are very clearly described,
for example:
"10)
Elliptic, elongated incision with 3 cm x 1 cm axis, at the
left groin crease."
"14)
Removal of the anal orifice with ample incision, oval shaped,
elongated, with 15 cm x 8 cm axis". Etc, etc....
So, in this case, again, there is no way out of the definitive
conclusion provided by an EITHER / OR binary type of proposition:
EITHER:
A bunch of absolutely inhuman, mad Brazilian ufologists
developed specialized equipment to imitate the cattle mutilation
signature, and killed an innocent victim, closely following
a script destined to back the supposed White Sands mutilation
of Sgt. Louette;
OR:
The horribly mutilated body of the Brazilian victim is proof
enough of the truthfulness of both Sgt. Louette's case and
the New Zealand report, and many others, meaning that we
will have to face the grim reality of all these cases, the
sooner the better.
I am reluctant to say it, but the impossibility to protect
the planet against this kind of cold blooded extraterrestrials
has probably been one of the main reasons for the endurance
of the UFO / ET cover up, which, under the circumstances,
seems to be a policy very easy to justify.
______________
Source:
http://www.reocities.com/aliengrip/mutilations/guarapiranga2-en.htm
|
