Date:
February 2003
Location: Weyauwega, Wisconsin, United States
The
witness states that she was outside during the evening
and happened to notice lights that passed overhead. She
says that her impression was the lights were from a balloon,
which should be noted, but the photographs that she took
seem to depict something other than a hot-air balloon
or dirigible.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c1c2f/c1c2f794290c2b1f5b8e5f2a0e73579c79ef0955" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fa4fe/fa4fe14f1718aeba78baaf0d641f9e7f6e0bc0cd" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11109/111094297f4dc04b03b1f9a1aaf7e08d208cbc08" alt=""
Source:
UFO Wisconsin Report
"My
son and I were visiting a friend of mine in Weyauwega.
I am reluctant to reveal the exact location out of concern
for my friend's privacy as well as my own. However, the
general location is just North of Main street on the East
side of 110 and South of the train tracks. My boy was
sledding in the snow and I was taking pictures. It was
in the evening and was starting to get dark pretty quickly.
My son pointed up to the sky and we noticed some lights
coming in from what I believe is the south west. At that
point, I just pointed the camera up and took the shots.
The object really gave me the impression of a balloon
- except for the lights. They seemed to cycle all different
patterns. The object passed almost directly overhead (picture
1) and then headed south, towards the train tracks (picture
2). As the object passed, I could make out more of a disk
shape than a balloon shape. I just remember my son asking
me over and over what it was and I didn't have a clue."
Note:
2/24/03 - As of today we have been unable to contact this
witness to further investigate this sighting. The witness
has not responded to our emails and did not include any
further contact information with the report. Any new information
will be posted here.
More analysis at:
http://www.ufowisconsin.com/county/reports2003/analysisweyauwegaphotos.html
Weyauwega UFO
Photographic
Evaluation
Anyone
familiar with the subject of UFOs has seen the hazy, out-of-focus,
or grainy pictures of what might be strange craft in the
sky, so when a clear picture of an alleged UFO appears,
it is immediately regarded with suspicion. These two pictures
are intriguing for what they appear to show a twilight
disk with no obvious signs of a hoax.
This
alleged sighting took place in the vicinity of Weyauwega,
Wisconsin, early February of this year, as reported in
the Feb. 26 issue of UFO Roundup and on UFOWisconsin.com.
The
witness states that she was outside during the evening
and happened to notice lights that passed overhead. She
says that her impression was the lights were from a balloon,
which should be noted, but the photographs that she took
seem to depict something other than a hot-air balloon
or dirigible.
The
witness did not provide any further details and has chosen
not to say any more about the sightings and photos. This
should be taken into consideration when deciding on the
validity of the sighting but could indicate a couple of
things. The witness could simply be protecting her privacy,
not unreasonable in an event as strange as this, or she
does not wish to be identified as a hoaxer.
In
either possibility, the photographs remain interesting
and worthy of further scrutiny.
Photograph
1
This
picture clearly shows a circular-shaped object with three
bright white lights and a small red light in a position
high in the sky relative to the photographer. The camera
appears to be well focused on the object in comparison
to the trees in the foreground with enough light remaining
in the sky for good depth-of-field.
A
contrast-enhanced enlargement of the picture shows us
image compression artifacts consistent with the JPEG compression
used in digital cameras. (Indicated by the boxy appearence
of the sky and granularity around the edges of the branches.)
The
object appears to be behind the branches of the tree in
the foreground, with the notable exception of the light
on the lower-left portion of the disk. However, because
of the brightness of the lights (which is more evident
in the second photograph) it would be consistent that
the thin branch would be washed out. Also, notice there
is a small branch evident in front of the much dimmer
red light.
We
can see no obvious digital manipulation of the image,
such as smearing from a digital 'paintbrush' or
inconsistencies where the object might have been carefully
masked to appear as though it were behind the branches.
The
object also appears washed out in the image, which is
consistent with how an object might appear at a great
height during a cloudy evening. This would say that it
wasn't an object simply hoisted behind a tree or some
kind of lighted frisbee.
Photograph
2
This
picture shows a disk-shaped object with four lights with
an aqua cast in a position lower in the sky relative to
the photographer than the first. Although less distinct
than the first photograph, a circular or disk-shaped outline
can be seen through the tree branches.
Similarly
to the first picture, the object seems to be behind the
tree. This picture is less compelling than the first,
but it, like the last, shows no obvious sign of digital
tampering.
Conclusions
While
there is nothing apparent in these images to give reason
to doubt there integrity, there is still no way to be
absolutely certain they were not faked. They were apparently
taken with a relatively low-end digital camera, but there
are plenty of ways that they could have been made to appear
that way. If the pictures had been taken with a 35mm camera
and the negatives were available for evaluation, we could
be much more certain about their legitimacy.
With
those reservations aside, I am intrigued by what they
do show. If real, these pictures are some of the clearest
I have seen of a low-flying daylight disk. Now, it's possible
that Goodyear or the nice folks in the Air Force decided
to send a top-secret prototype blimp to buzz Weyauwega,
but I doubt it.
Source:
http://www.ufoevidence.org/cases/case260.htm