Home
Introduction
to NOUFORS
What's
New
Products
Michel
M. Deschamps - Director
Personal
Sightings
Sightings
Archive
Newspaper
Archive
UFOs
UFO
Characteristics
UFO
Physical Traces
Animal
Mutilations
UFO
Occupants
Crop
Circles
Audio
Clips
Documents
Majestic-12
Politicians
and UFOs
Military
Officers
and UFOs
Scientists
and UFOs
Astronauts
and UFOs
Pilots
and UFOs
Cops
and Saucers
Celebrities
and UFOs
Who's
Who in
UFOlogy
Skeptics
and Debunkers
Encyclopedia
of Terminology and Abbreviations
Kidz'
Korner
Links
Recommended
Reading
Recommended
Viewing
|
|
Radar/Visual
Sightings of UFOs
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, DAILY STAR, 22 July 1952, page 1
Visible
on Radar Screen, Flying Saucers Are Real
WASHINGTON (AP) - The United States Air Force today investigated
reports that several "flying saucers" been spotted
by radar visually in its own back yard on the outskirts
of the country's capital.
Not only were unidentified objects seen on radar - indicating
actual substance instead of mere light - but two airline
pilots and a reporter saw eerie lights fitting the general
description of flying saucers the same night.
Officials could not immediately agree on whether this was
the first time radar has picked up flying saucers. All agreed
it was unusual.
The objects also were different from the average reported
saucer in that they travelled at a relatively slow speed,
as well as later disclosing the customary burst that far
outspeeds normal planes.
One thing was certain: A thorough investigation is being
made by the air technical intelligence centre, Wright-Patterson
air force base, Dayton, Ohio, which has been set up to look
into flying saucer reports.
The saucers over the capital were reported late Monday,
about 36 hours after the incident actually occurred.
This is the story as pieced together from air force reports,
persons involved, and other sources:
An operator at Washington National Airport spotted eight
unidentified images on one of his radars. The images were
going probably 100 to 130 miles per hour. That was around
midnight.
Capt. S. C. Pierman of Detroit, piloting Capital Airlines
flight 807, soon reported seeing seven objects between Washington
and Martinsburg, W.Va. He said they changed pace, sometimes
moving at tremendous speed, at other times hanging almost
motionless.
Another airliner, Capital-National Airlines flight 610,
also reported seeing a light following it from Herndon,
Va., to within four miles of Washington.
Saul Pett, an Associated Press reporter, said he saw a "flying
saucer" that same night near River Edge, N.J., outside
of New York. It was orange-colored, round, moved swiftly
and soundlessly, and he did not think it could have been
a plane, balloon, or meteor.
At Cleveland, a control tower operator said today "golden
lights" have been sighted over Cleveland, and on one
occasion he sent an airliner to look for something that
appeared on a radar screen.
George Beers, senior operator on the midnight shift of the
control tower at Cleveland Hopkins Airport, said "one
night six of us watched from the darkened tower room while
a light hovered north of the field. We don't know what it
was but all six of us saw it."
"Another
time I personally saw a light making a circular pattern
over or nearby Elyria. I picked it up on the radar screen
and watched it."
"I
sent an incoming airliner over to take a look and the thing
disappeared from the screen."
On another occasion a tower operator and an incoming pilot
both reported seeing a "light" that "climbed
and travelled in an easterly direction much faster than the
normal operational speed of any aircraft known to be in this
vicinity," said Beers. |
|
Kirkland
Lake, Ontario, NORTHERN DAILY NEWS, 28 July 1952, page 1
U.S.
Jet Fighters Hunting 'Saucers'
WASHINGTON
(AP) - Radar - which normally doesn't show something that
isn't there - has picked up "flying saucers" near
here for the second time within a week.
Jet
fighter pilots searched the skies Saturday night and early
yesterday without directly contacting anything during the
six hours that four to 12 unidentified objects intermittently
appeared on radar screens at Washington National Airport
and nearby Andrews air force base.
One
pilot said he saw four lights approximately 10 miles away
and slightly above him, but they disappeared before he could
overtake them. Later, the same pilot said, he saw "a
steady white light" five miles away that vanished in
about a minute.
So
far as could be determined, this was the first time jets
have been sent on the trail of such sky ghosts.
Officials
carefully avoided mentioning "flying saucers," just
as they did when radar picked up seven or eight unidentified
objects near Washington last Monday. But the U.S. Air Force
was expected to add the report to its long list of saucer
sightings, which officials say are coming in faster than at
any time since the initial flurry in 1947.
An air force spokesman said all necessary steps are being
taken to evaluate the newest phenomenon.
Radar normally does not register anything without substance
- such as light. But it can pick up such things as a bird
in flight or a cloud formation. And one expert said radar
is not infallible. |
|
Sault
Ste. Marie, Ontario, DAILY STAR, 28 July 1952, Page 1
Air
Force Jet Aircraft Scour Sky For 'Saucers' picked Up on
U.S. Radar
WASHINGTON (AP) - Radar - which normally doesn't show something
that isn't there - has picked up "flying saucers"
near here for the second time within a week.
Jet fighter pilots searched the skies Saturday night and
early yesterday without directly contacting anything during
the six hours that four to 12 unidentified objects intermittently
appeared on radar screens at Washington National Airport
and nearby Andrews air force base.
One pilot said he saw four lights approximately 10 miles
away and slightly above him but they disappeared before
he could overtake them. Later, the same pilot said, he saw
"a steady white light" five miles away that vanished
in about a minute.
So far as could be determined, this was the first time jets
have been sent on the trail of such sky ghosts.
Officials carefully avoided mentioning "flying saucers,"
just as they did when radar picked up seven or eight unidentified
objects near Washington last Monday. But the U.S. Air Force
was expected to add the report to its long list of saucer
sightings, which officials say are coming in faster than
at any time since the initial flurry in 1947.
An air force spokesman said all necessary steps are being
taken to evaluate the newest phenomenon.
Radar normally does not register anything without substance
- such as light. But it can pick up such things as a bird
in flight or a cloud formation. And one expert said radar
is not infallible.
|
|
North
Bay, Ontario, DAILY NUGGET, 30 July 1952, Page 22
RADAR
SPOTS 12 OBJECTS - ALL INVISIBLE
WASHINGTON (AP) - Radar showed the air over Washington was
full of flying objects early Tuesday but an airliner directed
to one of the radar sightings could not find a thing.
The Civil Aeronautics Administration radar at Washington
National Airport, which reported scores of sightings from
2:30 to 6 a.m. EDT., refrained from transmitting its findings
to the air force at nearby Andrews Field because "no
visual sightings were made."
The air force said its Andrews Field radar showed nothing.
Meanwhile, the Air Research and Development Command is continuing
its upper-air research studies with a new type camera used
in determining the source of light from luminous bodies.
A C.A.A. spokesman said the latest sightings showed as many
as 12 unidentified objects on the radar screen at one time.
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, DAILY STAR, 31 July 1952, page 10
Gives
Full Details Of 6 Hours Work Tracking 'Saucers'
By BARRY G. BARNES
WASHINGTON (NEA) - Shortly after midnight on July 19, Ed
Nugent called me over to the radar scope and laughingly
said:
"Here's
a fleet of flying saucers for you."
As it turns out now, Ed could very well have been stating
an absolute fact.
I am a senior air route traffic controller for the Civil
Aeronautics Administration and was in charge of the air
route traffic control centre that particular night at National
Airport. Briefly, part of our job is to constantly monitor
the skies around the nation's capital with the electronic
eye of radar for purposes of controlling air traffic.
Our shift had been on duty about 40 minutes. Eight men were
on this particular shift. It was a normal night for both
flying and weather. The sky was cloudless, no storms were
approaching. Air traffic was light, as usual for that period.
I think those facts are important in connection with what
came later.
The "things" which caused Ed to call me over to
the scope were seven pips clustered together irregularly
in one corner. The scope is 24 inches in diameter and the
pips show up as pale violet spots. Ordinarily they represent
aircraft in the air. The radar we were using scans a 70-mile
radius.
Not
Aircraft
The seven pips indicated that the objects or whatever they
were, were in the air over an area about nine miles in diameter,
15 miles south-southwest of Washington. We knew immediately
that a very strange situation existed. First, from all the
information we had at hand, we knew that the spots were
not aircraft - at least not friendly aircraft.
That left three possibilities, enemy aircraft, some unexplained
flying objects or something wrong with the radar. We tracked
the seven pips for about five minutes and quickly determined
that they were moving between 100 and 130 miles per hour
while we could observe them.
But their movements were completely radical compared to
those of ordinary aircraft. They followed no set course,
were not in any formation, and we only seemed to be able
to track them for about three miles at a time.
The individual pip would seem to disappear from the scope
at intervals. Later I realized that if these objects had
made any sudden burst of extremely high speed, that would
account for them disappearing from the scope temporarily.
Our radar is only designed to track known types of aircraft
or objects in the air at speeds known to all of us.
Findings
Confirmed
After five minutes of watching the strange pips, I asked
Jim Copeland and Jim Ritchey, two experienced radar controllers,
to check our observations. They confirmed our findings.
Then I called the airport control tower to see what the
radar showed there. The radar operator verified the same
thing instantly.
At this time I notified the air force of our observation.
This is a regular procedure but some parts of it are secret
and I am not at liberty to explain it in detail. But we
kept the air force informed of subsequent observations which
continued for approximately the next six hours, until after
daylight when we could no longer distinguish the objects
from other aircraft.
Early Sunday morning is an especially busy time for both
private flying and military reserve flying.
Before notifying the air force of our findings, our technicians
had carefully checked the equipment to make certain that
it was operating perfectly.
These are the important events of the next six hours:
During the first hour the objects had moved over all sectors
of our scope. That meant that they had been over the restricted
areas of Washington, including the White House and Capital.
Pilot
Joins Probe
At the first opportunity Ritchey contacted Capital Airline
pilot Captain S. C. Pierman, a veteran of 17 years of flying.
Shortly after taking off, Ritchey asked Pierman to look
for the objects we were watching on the scope. He agreed
to do this.
All of a sudden his voice came over the radio, which we
could all hear, with the words:
"There's
one, and there it goes."
He described it as just a bright light, moving faster than
a shooting star at times.
His subsequent descriptions of the movements of the objects
coincided with the position of our pips at all times while
in our range.
During the next 14 minutes he reported that he saw six such
lights. He said they had no tail, no recognizable shape
and were just bright lights in the dark sky.
Each sighting coincided with a pip we could see near his
plane. When he reported that the light streaked off at high
speed, it disappeared on our scope, for the apparent reason
I cited.
While he was giving us reports of his sightings, he was
on a course from Herndon, Va., to Martinsburg, W. Va.
Some of the other pilots we contacted reported that they
were unable to see the objects. I had the distinct feeling
that some of them were just unwilling to discuss the subject
over the radio.
However, one other commercial pilot did flatly confirm seeing
a light off his left wing, which we saw as a pip on the
scope. He was coming in for his landing and the tower scope
reported the same radar sighting. The light disappeared
on our scope and from his view about four miles before he
touched his wheels down.
Active
Near Planes
During the whole period of observation we could detect no
pattern to the movement of these objects. However, they
did seem to become most active around the planes we saw
on the scope. We did not see the pips in any recognizable
formation at any time.
The radar we were using does not show altitude and it is
faintly possible that the objects could have been in a vertical
formation without our recognizing it.
At one time toward daybreak we counted 10 objects over Andrews
Field, just outside of Washington. We sighted seven originally.
Most of the time we could count eight of them.
The only recognizable behavior pattern which occurred to
me from watching the pips was that they acted like a bunch
of small kids out playing. It was helter skelter, as if
directed by some innate curiosity. At times they moved as
a group or cluster. Other times as individuals over widely
scattered areas.
Other than some information in connection with our communications
with the air force, which is classified, the above is a
complete factual description of the important events which
took place during those six hours. These facts I have set
forth in my official report to CAA.
Speaking personally, and not officially for CAA, I would
like to make these additional comments:
Equipment
Perfect
Radar is strictly an electronics device. It has no imagination.
It reports only what it "sees." The equipment
was in perfect operating order during that period.
There is no other conclusion I can reach but that for six
hours on the morning of the 20th of July there were at least
10 unidentifiable objects moving above Washington. They
were not ordinary aircraft. I could tell that by their movements
on the scope.
I can safely deduce that they performed gyrations which
no known aircraft could perform. By this I mean that our
scope showed that they could make right angle turns and
complete reversals of flight.
Nor in my opinion could any natural phenomena such as shooting
stars, electrical disturbances or clouds, account for these
spots on our radar.
Exactly what they are? I don't know. You now know as much
about them as I do. And your guess is as good as mine.
|
|
North
Bay, Ontario, DAILY NUGGET, 31 July 1952, Page 12
These
"Saucers" Can't Be Brushed Off
_______
AIRLINE
PILOTS SEE THEM AND RADAR CONFIRMS IT ALL
Part One
By
DOUGLAS LARSEN
NEA Staff Correspondent
WASHINGTON (NEA) - The flying saucers are back. And their
return to the headlines has been the result of a startling
new development:
For the first time, numerous and simultaneous visual sightings
have been positively confirmed by official Civil Aeronautics
Administration radar observations. This has happened twice
under almost identical circumstances on two successive Saturday
nights.
Up until now, official and unofficial saucer debunkers have
produced credible theories to explain away reports of visual
sightings as natural phenomena. They have done the same
for individual radar sighting reports.
But none of this reasoning satisfactorily explains away
visual sightings absolutely confirmed by radar.
This remarkable new chapter in the weird flying saucer story
was written in the skies over Washington for six hours before
dawn on Sunday, July 20. and again one week later. The details
and implications of what took place are now confirmed by
CAA and the Air Force.
Since then, the Air Force has quietly said it was closing
to the press its special section at Wright Field in Dayton,
O., which has been studying flying saucer reports. In addition,
all information concerning that group's personnel, activities
and budget is now strictly classified.
Full details of what happened the first night are being
revealed for the first time by NEA Service.
These
are the facts:
Beginning shortly after midnight, and continuing until dawn,
eight experienced CAA radar operators and technicians, manning
the air route traffic control center in hanger No. 6 at
National Airport, tracked from seven to ten unidentifiable
and mysterious objects performing strange gyrations in the
skies in a 30-mile radius above Washington.
Harry G. Barnes, who has been with CAA for nine years, mostly
in radar work, was in charge of the group. After making
sure that the objects were not known aircraft and that the
radar was operating perfectly, he checked his findings with
the radar operators in the control tower. They instantly
confirmed what he saw, and continued to do so. The two radars
are completely separate units.
Later, the radar at nearby Andrews Air Force base also confirmed
the sightings.
When the center radar showed one of the unidentified objects
in a low position in the northwest sky, the operators in
the tower were able to see it. One of them, Howard Cocklin,
who has been with CAA for five years, describes it:
"It
was a good-sized light, yellow to orange in color. At first,
it looked like a great big star. Then it began to move in
a manner which made you realize it couldn't be a star. There
was no unusual high speed about its movements and at times,
it seemed to hover. We could see it moving around like that
for about 15 minutes. It just disappeared into the northwest
sky."
There are no windows in the center Barnes was operating.
None of the eight men could leave to go outside to try to
check their own radar sightings visually.
As is normal at that time, air traffic was very light. But
at the first opportunity, an operator in Barnes' office
contacted Capital Airlines pilot Capt. S. C. Pierman shortly
after he took off and asked him to look for the objects.
For about 14 minutes, Pierman was in direct, two-way communication
with Barnes. While he was within radar range, Pierman was
able to see six objects which showed up on the path indicated
by the center's radar. Pierman's sightings reported to Barnes
coincided exactly with the radar sightings, Barnes reports.
Pierman is a 17-year veteran of commercial flying and is
described by Capital Airlines officials as very level-headed
and "taciturn." After he landed in Detroit, Pierman
had this to say about the sightings:
"In
my years of flying, I've seen a lot of falling or shooting
stars - whatever you call them - but these were much faster
than anything like that I've ever seen. They were about
the same size as the brighter stars. And they were much
higher than our 6000-foot altitude. I couldn't estimate
the speed accurately. Please remember I didn't speak of
them as flying saucers - only very fast moving lights."
Charles Wheaton, first officer on the flight with Pierman,
a veteran of 12 years of flying confirms Pierman's sightings
and adds:
"Before
the other night, I always discounted alleged flying saucers
as atmospheric phenomenon. But now I feel I have actually
seen some active strange objects which defy explanation."
Another Capital Airlines pilot also reported seeing a light
off his wing, which showed up in that position on the radar
scope. Other pilots in the air that night, Barnes reveals,
appeared to be reluctant to discuss the subject with him
on the radio.
The mystery of the flying saucers had its start on June
24, 1947, when a Boise, Idaho, businessman, Kenneth Arnold,
flew his private plane over the jagged peaks of Washington's
Mt. Rainier. When he landed, he breathlessly reported having
seen "a chain of nine saucer-like objects playing tag
at fantastic speeds."
Since then, there have been thousands of sightings all over
the world, many obviously reported by crackpots. But a substantial
number have been so strange ands reliably described, even
the Air Force has had to admit that they were unexplainable.
Many books have been written on the subject. Hundreds of
magazine articles have treated all aspects of the question.
However, a review of most of what has been written and officially
reported on the subject points up several unique aspects
to the recent Washington sightings:
It's the first time that three separate radar sets have
reported identical sightings.
It's the first time they have remained under observation
in one area for so long a time.
It's the first time so many completely responsible men,
including radar operators and pilots, all observed and reported
the same thing at the same time, with all reports checking
so accurately.
Both nights, there were scores of unofficial stories of
persons in the area who claim to have seen one or more strange
lights moving about in the sky.
Saul Pett, a news service reporter in River Edge, N.J.,
wrote a detailed story on one that he saw just before seven
objects appeared on the CAA radar screen at National Airport.
He said:
"It
looked like a sphere, so deeply orange colored that it appeared
almost the shade of rust. It was silent as death. It was
moving too fast and evenly to be a balloon. I saw a flying
saucer and you can't convince me that there is no such animal."
He said it disappeared in the direction of Washington.
|
|
North
Bay, Ontario, DAILY NUGGET, 1 August 1952, Page 11
Air
Force Not Laughing At "Saucers" Any More
Part Two
By
DOUGLAS LARSEN of NEA Service
The Air Force has the responsibility of finding out what
there is to the saucer reports. After two years' study,
it finally reported in 1950:
"All
evidence and analyses indicate that the reports of unidentified
flying objects are the result of: (1) Misinterpretation
of various conventional objects; (2) a mild form of mass
hysteria; (3) or hoaxes."
Lt. Col. DeWitt R. Searles, an Air Force press officer,
was given the job of officially denying the existence of
saucers from then on. His file on the subject was labeled
"death of the saucers."
On June 17 of this year, however, Col. Searles was forced
to reveal a slight alteration in the Air Force stand on
saucers. He issued a statement which said:
"No
concrete evidence has yet reached us to either prove or
disapprove the existence of the so-called flying saucers.
However, there remain a number of sightings which have not
been satisfactorily explained. As long as this is true,
the Air Force will continue to investigate flying saucers
reports."
Air Force reaction to the recent Washington sightings has
been curious, and its reports have been conflicting. A few
minutes after CAA confirmed its sightings on the 20th, it
reported the fact to the Air Force in a normal but classified
procedure.
For the next several days, the Air Force claimed that its
radar at nearby Andrews Air Force base did not confirm the
findings of the CAA radar. Later, however, the Air Force
reversed itself and admitted that the Andrews radar did
pick up the objects, four hours after the first CAA report.
On July 20 then, the strange objects appeared on three separate
radar sets for two hours. A week later, the Air Force admitted
that its Andrews radar had practically identical sightings
to the other two all evening.
The first night, no fighter planes went aloft to investigate
the sightings. A week later, however, the Air Force sent
up jets to try to get a closer look at the objects.
The only report from the fighter pilots was that they saw
strange lights, moving too fast for the 600 mph jets to
intercept.
Another conflicting Air Force report concerns a saucer expert
from the now barricaded unit at Dayton, Capt. E. J. Ruppelt.
He "happened" to be in town at the time. An AF
spokesman said that he would interview all of the persons
involved in the sightings.
A week later, however, Capt. Ruppelt had left town and had
not contacted a single one of the CAA persons involved.
Col. Searles reported that he had taken a copy of Barnes'
brief summary report in long hand over the telephone next
day. That constitutes the Air Force's only official recognition
of the events of the 20th. The AF however, now promises
to make a thorough investigation of the events of both nights.
In the unofficial category of saucer study is the theory
of Dr. Donald H. Menzel, a Harvard professor of astrophysics.
It seems to have had most effect in debunking saucer reports
among the experts.
He says visual sightings could be ordinary lights which
are reflected from warm layers of air. And he says radar
can produce a false pip in the same way.
According to several experts in Washington, who asked not
to be quoted, Menzel's theory does not account for the simultaneous
visual and radar sightings.
Further, it isn't likely that any warm layer of reflecting
air would have remained constant for so long a period over
Washington that night.
Coincidental with the recent Washington sightings and increased
reports of saucer sightings all over the U.S. this summer,
has been increased rumors around the Pentagon and from other
government agencies attempting to explain saucers. And they
appear to be coming from more reliable sources, although
these sources continue to refuse to let themselves be identified.
Most persistent rumor is that Boeing Airplane Co. in Seattle,
Wash., is either making flying saucers or has been in charge
of the engineering of the project. The rumor goes that very
small parts of the saucers are being made by widely scattered
subcontractors and that the finished items are being assembled
at some remote site.
A Boeing spokesman in Seattle flatly denies this rumor,
as does the Air Force.
The descriptions of the saucers which have been sighted
indicates that some radically new source of power would
be needed to make the objects move as fast as they did.
If this is true, it doesn't make sense that the Air Force
would be expending such a tremendous effort to improve its
present jet engines, which would be made completely obsolete
by the new source of power. Nor would the Air Force be likely
to have its saucers practice maneuvers early Sunday morning
around Washington.
In the weirder category of rumors is the one that the saucers
are either Russian- built or from another planet, and that
several of them have crashed and have been picked up by
the Air Force. It goes on to theorize that the Air Force
has been able to repair some of them and make them operate,
and at the same time, is trying to build some of its own
just like them.
This would account for the Air Force being extremely interested
in some sightings, and apparently very disinterested in
others.
Col. Searles, who has had more experience in denying saucer
rumors than anyone in the Pentagon, just laughs at this
idea.
But nobody is really laughing at the strange objects tracked
by radar over the nation's capital.
|
|
Sault
Ste. Marie, Ontario, DAILY STAR, 2 August 1952, Page 6
KOREA,
JAPAN JUMP INTO ACT, SEE SKY SAUCERS
SEOUL - (AP) - Those "flying saucers" have popped
up in Korea and Japan.
A Canadian destroyer recently reported sighting two such
objects and recorded them on its radar, it was learned here
today.
A navy report said 40 officers and crew members of the destroyer
Crusader saw the "saucers" the night of July 10.
All had the familiar qualities of the puzzling flying discs.
The report, addressed to the commanders of the far east
naval forces and the fifth Air Force, said the ship's radar
registered "fixes" on the objects. It placed them
two miles high and seven miles away. The report said the
objects disappeared before dawn.
A second report, a day or two later, dismissed the radar
find as the planet Jupiter. One officer commented, however:
"Jupiter doesn't come in pairs and it is several million
miles out of range of our radar."
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, DAILY STAR, 2 August 1952, page 2
Seen
by Radar Observers, 'Saucers' Hard to Debunk
By DOUG LARSEN
WASHINGTON (NEA) - The flying saucers are back.
And their return to the headlines has been the result of
a startling new development:
For the first time, numerous and simultaneous visual sightings
have been positively confirmed by official U.S. Civil Aeronautics
Administration radar observations. This has happened twice
under almost identical circumstances on two successive Saturday
nights.
Up until now official and unofficial saucer debunkers have
produced credible theories to explain away reports of visual
sightings as natural phenomena. They have done the same
for individual radar sighting reports.
But none of this reasoning satisfactorily explains away
visual sightings absolutely confirmed by radar.
This remarkable new chapter in the weird flying saucer story
was written in the skies over Washington for six hours before
dawn on Sunday, July 20,and again one week later. The details
and implications of what took place are now confirmed by
CAA and the air force.
Since then the air force has quietly said it was closing
to the press its special section at Wright Field in Dayton,
O., which has been studying flying saucer reports. In addition,
all information concerning that group's personnel, activities
and budget is now strictly classified.
First
Full Details
Full details of what happened the first night are being
revealed here for the first time.
These
Are the Facts:
Beginning shortly after midnight, and continuing until dawn,
eight experienced CAA radar operators and technicians, manning
the air route traffic control center in hangar No. 6 at
National Airport, tracked from seven to ten unidentifiable
and mysterious objects in the skies in a 30-mile radius
above Washington.
Harry G. Barnes, who has been with CAA for nine years, mostly
in radar work, was in charge of the group. After making
sure that the objects were not known aircraft and that the
radar was operating perfectly, he checked his findings with
the radar operators in the control tower. They instantly
confirmed what he saw, and continued to do so. The two radars
are completely separate units.
Later the radar at nearby Andrews air force base also confirmed
the sightings.
When the centre radar showed one of the unidentified objects
in a low position in the northwest sky, the operators in
the tower were able to see it. One of them, Howard Cocklin,
who has been with CAA for five years, describes it:
"Couldn't
be Star"
"It
was a good-sized light, yellow to orange in color. At first
it looked like a great big star. Then it began to move in
a manner which made you realize it couldn't be a star. There
was no unusual high speed about its movements and at times
it seemed to hover. We could see it moving around like that
for about 15 minutes. It just disappeared into the north-west
sky."
There are no windows in the centre Barnes was operating.
None of the eight men could leave to go outside to try to
check their own radar sightings visually.
As is normal at that time air traffic was very light. But
at the first opportunity an operator in Barnes' office contacted
Capital Airlines pilot S. C. Pierman shortly after he took
off and asked him to look for the objects.
For about 14 minutes, Pierman was in direct, two-way communication
with Barnes. While he was within radar range, Pierman was
able to see six objects which showed up on the path indicated
by the centre's radar. Pierman's sightings reported to Barnes
coincided exactly with the radar sightings, Barnes reports.
Pierman is a 17-year veteran of commercial flying and is
described by Capital Airlines officials as very level-headed
and "taciturn." After he landed in Detroit Pierman
had this to say about the sightings:
Fast-Moving
Lights
"In
my years of flying I've seen a lot of falling or shooting
stars - whatever you call them - but these were much faster
than anything like that I've ever seen. They were about
the same size as the brighter stars. And they were much
higher than our 6000-foot altitude. I couldn't estimate
the speed accurately. Please remember I didn't speak of
them as flying saucers - only very fast moving lights."
Charles Wheaton, first officer on the flight with Pierman,
a veteran of 12 years of flying confirms Pierman's sightings
and adds:
"Before
the other night, I always discounted alleged flying saucers
as atmospheric phenomena. But now I feel I have actually
seen some active strange objects which defy explanation."
Another Capital Airlines pilot also reported seeing a light
off his wing, which showed up in that position on the radar
scope. Other pilots in the air that night, Barnes reveals,
appeared to be reluctant to discuss the subject with him
on the radio.
The mystery of the flying saucers had its start on June
24, 1947, when a Boise, Idaho, businessman, Kenneth Arnold,
flew his private plane over the jagged peaks of Washington's
Mt. Rainier. When he landed, he breathlessly reported having
seen "a chain of nine saucer-like objects playing tag
at fantastic speeds."
Since then there have been thousands of sightings all over
the world, many obviously reported by crackpots. But a substantial
number have been so strange and reliably described, even
the air force has had to admit that they were unexplainable.
Many books have been written on the subject. Hundreds of
magazine articles have treated all aspects of the question.
However, a review of most of what has been written and officially
reported on the subject points up several unique aspects
to the recent Washington sightings:
It's the first time that three separate radar sets have
reported identical sightings.
It's the first time they have remained under observation
in one area for so long a time.
It's the first time so many completely responsible men,
including radar operators and pilots all observed and reported
the same thing at the same time, with all reports checking
so accurately.
Both nights there were scores of unofficial stories of persons
in the area who claim to have seen one or more strange lights
moving about in the sky.
Saul Pett, a news service reporter in River Edge, N.J.,
wrote a detailed story on one that he saw just before seven
objects appeared on the CAA radar screen at National Airport.
He said:
"It
looked like a sphere, so deeply orange colored that it appeared
almost the shade of rust. It was silent as death. It was
moving too fast and evenly to be a balloon. I saw a flying
saucer and you can't convince me that there is no such animal."
He said it disappeared in the direction of Washington. |
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, DAILY STAR, 5 August 1952, page 22
'Saucers'
Moved Too Fast for U.S. Jets
EDITOR'S NOTE: This is the second of two NEA articles on
recent "flying saucer" sightings at Washington,
D.C., which were confirmed by radar sightings of unidentified
objects in the air near Washington.
______
WASHINGTON (NEA) - The U.S. air force has the responsibility
of finding out what there is to the many saucer reports,
which have broken out on a large scale once again. After
two years' study it finally reported in 1950:
"All
evidence and analyses indicate that the reports of unidentified
flying objects are the result of:
(1)
Misinterpretation of various conventional objects; (2) a
mild form of mass hysteria; (3) or hoaxes."
Lt. Col. DeWitt R. Searles, an air force press officer,
was given the job of officially denying the existence of
saucers from then on. His file on the subject was labeled
"death of the saucers."
On June 17 of this year, however, Col. Searles was forced
to reveal a slight alteration in the air force stand on
saucers. He issued a statement which said:
"No
complete evidence has yet reached us to either prove or
disprove the existence of the so-called flying saucers.
However, there remain a number of sightings which have not
been satisfactorily explained. As long as this is true the
air force will continue to investigate flying saucers reports."
Air force reaction to the recent Washington sightings has
been curious, and its reports have been conflicting. A few
minutes after CAA confirmed its sightings of the 20th it
reported the fact to the air force in a normal but classified
procedure.
For the next several days the air force claimed that its
radar at nearby Andrews air force base did not confirm the
findings of the CAA radar. Later, however, the air force
reversed itself and admitted that the Andrews radar did
pick up the objects, four hours after the first CAA report.
On July 20, then, the strange objects appeared on three
separate radar sets for two hours. A week later the air
force admitted that its Andrews radar had practically identical
sightings to the other two all evening.
The first night no fighter planes went aloft to investigate
the sightings. A week later, however, the air force sent
up jets to try to get a closer look at the objects. The
only report from the fighter pilots was that they saw strange
lights, moving too fast for the 600 mph jets to intercept.
Another conflicting air force report concerns a saucer expert
from the now barricaded unit at Dayton, Capt. E. J. Ruppelt.
He "happened" to be in town at the time. An AF
spokesman said that he would interview all of the persons
involved in the sightings.
A week later, however, Capt. Ruppelt had left town and had
not contacted a single one of the CAA persons involved.
Col. Searles reported that he had taken a copy of Barnes'
brief summary report in long hand over the telephone next
day. That constitutes the air force's only official recognition
of the events of the 20th. The U.S.A.F., however, now promises
to make a thorough investigation of the events of both nights.
In the unofficial category of saucer study is the theory
of Dr. Donald H. Menzel, a Harvard professor of astrophysics.
It seems to have had most effect in debunking saucer reports
among the experts.
He says visual sightings could be ordinary lights which
are reflected from warm layers of air. And he says radar
can produce a false pip in the same way.
According to several experts in Washington, who asked not
to be quoted, Menzel's theory does not account for the simultaneous
visual and radar sightings.
Further, it isn't likely that any warm layer of reflecting
air would have remained constant for so long a period over
Washington that night.
Coincidental with the recent Washington sightings and increased
reports of saucer sightings all over the U.S. this summer,
has been increased rumors around the Pentagon and from other
government agencies attempting to explain saucers. And they
appear to be coming from more reliable sources, although
these sources continue to refuse to let themselves be identified.
Most persistent rumor is that Boeing Airplane Co. in Seattle,
Wash., is either making flying saucers or has been in charge
of the engineering of the project. The rumor goes that very
small parts of the saucers are being made by widely scattered
subcontractors and that the finished items are being assembled
at some remote site.
A Boeing spokesman in Seattle flatly denies this rumor,
as does the air force.
The descriptions of the saucers which have been sighted
indicates that some radically new source of power would
be needed to make the objects move as fast as they did.
If this were true it doesn't make sense that the air force
would be expending such a tremendous effort to improve its
present jet engines, which would be made completely obsolete
by the new source of power. Nor would the air force be likely
to have its saucers practice manoeuvres early Sunday morning
around Washington.
In the weirder category of rumors is the one that the saucers
are either Russian-built or from another planet and that
several of them have crashed and have been picked up by
the air force. It goes on to theorize that the air force
has been able to repair some of them and make them operate
and at the same time is trying to build some of its own
just like them.
This would account for the air force being extremely interested
in some sightings, and apparently very disinterested in
others.
Col. Searles, who has had more experience in denying saucer
rumors than anyone in the Pentagon, just laughs at this
idea.
But nobody is really laughing at the strange objects tracked
by radar over the U.S. capital. |
|
North
Bay, Ontario, DAILY NUGGET, 6 August 1952, Page 1
Can't
See Them
"FLYING SAUCER" FLEET FILLS
WASHINGTON SKY
WASHINGTON (AP) - The heaviest concentration of unidentified
objects yet observed in the skies here - a veritable fleet
of "flying saucers" - moved across radar screens
early today.
A spokesman at Andrews air force base said the blips were
observed late last night, and that early today they were
still moving slowly and steadily across the screens.
Planes were directed to intercept the objects, but reported
they were unable to see anything.
Radar operators said the objects were moving at about 60 miles
an hour from west to east. |
|
Kirkland
Lake, Ontario, NORTHERN DAILY NEWS, 22 January 1953, page
17
See
Mysterious Flying Objects In Air Over Northern Japan
U.S. AIR BASE, Japan (AP) - Mysterious flying objects -
"rotating clusters of red, white and green lights"
- have been sighted over northern Japan by United States
airmen, the air force disclosed today.
Intelligence reports placed the sightings close to Russian
territory in the Kurile islands and Sakhalin. They added:
"There
are too many indications of the presence of something .
. . to be considered an observation of nothing." And
they discounted the possibility the sighted objects were
mere "reflections of light."
Col. Curtis R. Low, commander of the northern division of
the Japanese air defence force, said the flying clusters
were seen by fighter pilots and ground personnel and were
tracked on radar.
The reports were similar to those describing "flying
saucers" in the U.S. One said the lights appeared to
hang motionless at times, and at other times disappeared
with blinding speed.
Sightings were made by many persons at many points over
northern Japan last Dec. 29. On Jan. 9, a rotating cluster
was spotted by two fighter pilots and was tracked on radar.
The sightings occurred over the frozen, ice-locked reaches
of northern Japan, a land tense with continued air harassment
by near-flying Russian fighter planes.
Russian territory in the Kurile islands is only 4½
miles northeast of Hokkaido, Japan's northernmost island.
The Russian island of Sakhalin is only 30 miles north of
Hokkaido. The reds have dozens of air bases on Sakhalin
and the Kuriles.
The clusters were seen Dec. 29 by two crew members of an
F-94 interceptor for about 40 minutes, by two crew members
of a B-26 bomber for five to seven minutes, and by five
different airmen on the ground, intelligence said. They
were also seen by a pilot who tried to get close to one.
The five ground observers said the objects "were circular
ferris wheel disc types with rotational red, green, and
white lights."
Intelligence said the ground observers watched the objects
"for varying times, ranging from 30 minutes to three
hours."
The air force said a rotating cluster Jan. 9 near an air base
in northern Honshu "was observed visually by a pilot
of an F-94 jet interceptor for approximately one minute .
. . Radar contact for approximately two minutes was verified
by both members of the crew." |
|
North
Bay, Ontario, DAILY NUGGET, 20 April 1953, Page 1
Watch
Saucer Over Red Lines
SEOUL (AP) - Four U.S. Army airmen Sunday reported seeing
a small "white, rounded, delta-shaped object"
flying at 60 to 80 miles an hour over Communist territory
on the Korean western front.
An official intelligence report said the sighting was made
north of Pork Chop and Old Baldy hills where heavy fighting
has raged the last few days.
OTHERS
OBSERVED
An officer with a front-line division who asked not to be
identified by name told The Associated Press that other
luminous objects, travelling at super-sonic speeds of 800
miles per hour, had been observed in the Baldy-Pork Chop
area and tracked on radar - also within the last few days.
However, the official G-2 report made no mention of these
other incidents.
The release said:
"At
approximately 1 p.m. today (Sunday) aerial observers in
two separate planes flying routine reconnaissance missions,
observed a white, rounded, delta-shaped object."
"It
was estimated to be five to seven feet in diameter. The
observers had no idea of its depth or thickness."
"It
was travelling between 60 and 80 miles per hour in a vibrating
motion. The course of flight was north northeast to south
southwest over enemy territory."
|
|
North
Bay, Ontario, DAILY NUGGET, 19 November 1953, Page 1
U.K.
RADAR TRACKS GIGANTIC SKY BALL
_______
Object
Seen By 2 Pilots
LONDON (AP) - A huge glowing object described by observers
as metallic has been tracked by radar high over England
twice this month, the war office disclosed Wednesday night.
Official reports of the sightings were made by members of
two army radar crews who estimated the height of the object
as 60,000 feet.
The first report came from Sgt. Harry Waller and three other
witnesses who were making a test of a radar set for the
256th heavy anti-aircraft regiment in southeast London Nov.
3.
The report said the object was kept in sight for 40 minutes.
Then it moved out of range.
"There
was a strong echo on the screen, so I looked through the
telescope and there it was, just like a tennis ball,"
Waller told reporters. "It was dead white and completely
circular. I couldn't see it with the naked eye."
"The
sky that day was very clear and blue with only a few high
clouds. The object was stationary for about 15 minutes.
Then it started moving off."
NOT
A BALLOON
"It
couldn't have been a balloon. To get the kind of signal
we got, it must have been metallic. It must have been huge,
because the signal was three or four times as large as that
received from the biggest airliner."
A similar report was made Nov. 3 by FO. T. S. Johnson and
FO. C. H. Smythe of the RAF. They were at 20,000 feet in
a jet plane, they said, when the object passed far overhead
at "tremendous speed."
An air ministry spokesman said every such report is investigated
"but we are not prepared to comment on individual reports."
5
PER CENT PUZZLERS
"About
95 per cent are found to be due to natural phenomena,"
he added. "About the others, the experts can reach
no conclusions."
Over London, the object was practically motionless, the
war office said, and had an altitude of 61,000 feet. Its
slowness excludes a plane and its height, nearly 11½
miles, excludes a helicopter.
The experts say no meteorite or other celestial phenomenon
would have shown up in the same way in the radar screen. |
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, DAILY STAR, 12 December 1953, page 1
'Greenish-Blue
Thing' Puts Radar on Alert
OTTAWA (CP) - RCAF radar Friday night was watching for a
"thing" after a "greenish-blue" light
was spotted over Lake Ontario by a Trans-Canada Air Lines
flight.
The pilot and co-pilot of TCA Flight 402, bound from New
York to Toronto, reported about 9 p.m. that the light illuminated
the overcast as it descended slowly.
Similar reports of a "greenish-blue" light came
from Smiths Falls, some 40 miles south of here.
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, DAILY STAR, 18 September 1954, page 1
Radar
Picks Up Mystery Object Flying Over Italy
ROME (Reuters) - The Italian Air Force announced today that
one of its radar stations had tracked for 39 minutes a big
cigar-shaped object seen by thousands of Romans Friday night.
The air force said the object was shaped like a cigar cut
in two, with a big antenna amidships. A trail of luminous
smoke poured from the pointed rear.
The object flew slowly at first, then darted off at great
speed and disappeared. It flew at 3,600 feet along a 15-mile
stretch of coast west of the capital.
Thousands phoned police to say they had seen it. |
|
Sault
Ste. Marie, Ontario, DAILY STAR, 5 August 1965, Page 1
Track
Seven Objects Flying over Superior
HOUGHTON (UPI) - Personnel at the U.S. Air Force radar base
on the Keweenaw Peninsula today reported "solid radar
contact" with 7 to 10 unidentified flying objects moving
in a "V" formation over Lake Superior Wednesday.
The objects were moving out of the southwest and were heading
north-northeast at about 9,000 miles per hour, the men said.
They were at an altitude of 5,200 to 17,000 feet.
One of the men at the base said three other radar stations
- in North Dakota, Minnesota and Luther Air Station in Canada
- also reported spotting the objects. He said the Luther
Air Station reported electronic jamming of its radar.
Seven other objects were spotted over Duluth and jet interceptors
gave chase, he said, but could not maintain the speed of
the UFO's and were easily outdistanced.
The radar personnel, Air Force enlisted men, asked that
their names not be disclosed.
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 19 April 1967, page 15
Radar
Technicians in Soviet Union Also Puzzled by Origin of UFO
Blips
MOSCOW (AP) - A Soviet scientist says there may really be
such things as flying saucers from outer space.
Soviet radar screens have detected unidentified flying objects
for 30 years, he says.
But Soviet scientists, like their colleagues in the West,
are still puzzled about what such UFOs really are.
The scientist, identified only as F. Zigel, was writing
in the current issue of the illustrated Soviet youth magazine
Cmena.
He offered five possible explanations for UFOs, including
visitors from outer space. He called this alternative "extremely
speculative."
Zigel was identified as one of the editors of a book, Inhabited
Cosmos, being prepared for publication here. The book will
discuss the possibility of living beings in space and efforts
to communicate with them.
In his magazine article, Zigel said the Angel Echo a UFO
detected by radar, is constantly observed by scientists
at the Central Aerological Observatory near Moscow.
GLOBAL
SIGHTINGS
Similar observations, he said, have been made in the United
States, Australia, India and Japan.
He rejected the idea that birds, insects or plant seeds
could cause such reactions on radar screens.
Zigel said there could be no doubt that UFOs exist "but
the nature of these objects is still not understandable
today."
Then he listed these five possible explanations:
1. Nonsense or invention. He said there was some untruth
here, citing reports of people who claimed to have ridden
in flying saucers and others who threw hats in the air and
then photographed "saucers." But he rejected this
alternative as killing the question rather than solving
it.
AN
ILLUSION?
2. An optical illusion related to the distribution of light
in the earth's atmosphere, such as a rainbow. The UFO, he
said, is more complicated than that, however.
3. A new secret flying apparatus of one of the military
powers on earth. "No one holds this view now,"
he said.
4. An unknown phenomena of nature, just as radioactivity
was unknown until the end of the last century. In this context,
ionized particles and charged particles of dust in the atmosphere
were given as a possible explanation. But, Zigel said, this
does not explain the color or manoeuvrability of UFOs or
their appearance in good weather.
5. Space ships from an advanced civilization on another
planet. Zigel said the speed of UFOs supports this theory.
So does what he called "the fact" that no UFOs
were ever reliably reported to have landed.
Zigel called for "an all-sided thorough, scientific exploration"
to clear up the origin of UFOs once and for all. |
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 13 December 1968, page 14
Radar
Station Didn't See UFO
OTTAWA (CP) - The Canadian forces radar station at Sioux
Lookout, Ont., did not record any unidentified flying object
on the night of Nov. 27, David Groos, parliamentary secretary
to Defence Minister Leo Cadieux, said in the Commons Thursday.
He was replying to John Reid (L - Kenora-Rainy River) who
said several people in the town saw a strange light in the
sky that night.
Mr. Reid said there have been a number of sightings in northwestern
Ontario in recent years. If the government has any information
about them it should be made available to the public, he said. |
|
North
Bay, Ontario, NUGGET, 1 November 1975, Page 2
Radar
didn't identify UFO
The Canadian Forces Base, SAGE complex, was asked to assist
OPP officers to identify a UFO hovering over Iron Island
Thursday night.
The OPP detachments in North Bay and Sturgeon Falls observed
the bright white light from about 10 p.m. to 1 a.m., when
the light went out.
Capt. E. Philip Ripley, 22nd NORAD Region Control Centre,
told The Nugget Friday the SAGE complex did not track a
UFO on its radar.
He said this particular sighting, like most others, was
a stationary object in a low-lying area. The radar equipment
is designed to pick-up relatively slow-flying aircraft above
geographical obstructions.
The object could be mistaken for heavy cloud cover or part
of the landscape. One-half-inch on a radar screen covers
about a ten-mile radius, giving a wide area in which to
focus on such a small object. Also adding to the difficulty
of tracking is the fact that most of these objects move
vertically, out of the radar scope, at a tremendous rate
of speed, he said.
"There
were no aircraft reported in that area Thursday night,"
Cpt. Ripley said. |
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 11 November 1975, pages 1 & 3
Radar
base, police see UFO here
By ROB ROWLAND, Star Staff Writer
Unidentified flying objects were sighted over Sudbury and
Haileybury early this morning.
At least seven regional police officers, one Ontario Provincial
Police officer and the staff at Canadian Forces Station
Falconbridge saw the objects. The UFOs were also spotted
on the Falconbridge radar screens.
Four people at the radar station at Falconbridge saw the
UFOs in the sky and tracked something on radar. But a spokesman
for CFS Falconbridge would only say there was no apparent
correlation between police sightings and anything that might
have appeared on radar.
CONFIRMED
In Ottawa, National Defence Headquarters confirmed that
four people at the radar station, alerted by the police,
saw three bright circles with two black dots about 6:15
a.m. The objects were photographed by the base staff.
The UFOs picked up on radar were moving upward between 42,000
and 72,000 feet. They were visible at about 30 nautical
miles from the station for about 14 minutes. Other objects,
too far away to be observed were also seen by the station
staff.
First to see the UFOs here were regional constables Bob
Whiteside and Alex Keable.
They spotted three objects in the sky about 4:50 a.m. and
drove to a vantage point on Logan Ave. in the west of the
city. There they saw four objects; the brightest in the
eastern part of the sky. One, in the southwest moved at
times and seemed to jerk, another in the northeast remained
stationary throughout the time the two officers were observing.
The objects were still visible when the two officers went
off duty at 7 a.m. By that time, their report said, the
sun was coming up and the stars were gone.
Another officer saw an object north of the city moving at
a high rate of speed toward the northwest for about a minute.
Cons. John Marsh, on patrol on Highway 17E near Coniston,
said in a report the sky was cloudy but he was able to observe
lights in the sky toward the southwest. Those objects too,
moved in a jerking manner and were pulsating. "It was
different from what you would normally call a star,"
Cons. Marsh said in his report.
Between 5 a.m. and 7:15 a.m. Cons. Gary Chrapchynski and
policewoman J. B. Deighton watched an UFO in the west part
of the city.
They said they saw an object lighting up the clouds and
obtained a pair of binoculars to watch the UFO. Their report
said the object was cylindrical and bright. It remained
in the sky until after the sun rose and the stars had gone.
The Sudbury provincial police office said it was called
by regional police but saw nothing. One officer at the Dowling
detachment who wouldn't give his name said he followed a
bright object down Highway 144 and Errington St. in the
Chelmsford area.
In Haileybury, more than 100 miles to the east on the Ontario-Quebec
border, provincial police reported a civilian radio dispatcher,
Fred Sauve of New Liskeard, spotted a bright object over
Lake Timiskaming, about 5 a.m.
An OPP spokesman said a report was not ready on the sighting
but the object was bright, white and larger than a star,
according to Mr. Sauve.
|
|
North
Bay, Ontario, NUGGET, 11 November 1975, Page 16
UFOs
sighted at Haileybury
HAILEYBURY (Staff) - Rumors of unidentified flying objects
continue to circulate in the Tri-Town area. The Nugget's
Northern Bureau has received several reports during the
past week.
Early this morning, an OPP civilian radio operator was reported
to have seen a bright white object in the sky, but OPP officials
here were reluctant to confirm or deny the sighting pending
further investigations.
Reports from Sudbury quote the Regional police as confirming
the sightings, and said the objects were picked up on radar. |
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 12 November 1975, page 1
U.S.
jets scrambled on UFOs
More sightings reported; radar base won't
comment
By ROB ROWLAND, Star Staff Writer
A squadron of U.S. Air National Guard F-106 interceptors
were scrambled Tuesday morning to check the skies over Sudbury
for UFOs spotted on radar, The Star learned today.
The jet fighters were sent aloft several hours after the
last Sudbury Regional Police sighting at 7:15 a.m. A North
American Air Defence (NORAD) command spokesman in North
Bay said the fighters were scrambled from the U.S. Air Force
base at Selfridge, Michigan, at 12:50 p.m. local time.
In Colorado Springs, Del Kindschi, a public information
officer for NORAD, confirmed something had been tracked
over Sudbury.
He said an object was picked up on the Falconbridge radar
about 30 nautical miles south of the station. He added that
whatever was spotted visually by the station personnel -
three glowing lights with dark centres - was not necessarily
the same thing seen on radar.
The U.S. fighters did not find anything when they reached
here, Mr. Kindschi said.
In North Bay, the public affairs officer for 22nd NORAD
division said North Bay-based aircraft did not respond.
Sudbury is part of the 23rd division and for a routine scramble,
such as the one on Tuesday, the response comes from bases
in the 23rd Division.
In a real emergency, planes from North Bay would come, he
said.
Another UFO was reported last night by Sudbury Regional
Police. Two officers, whose names were not released saw
a lighted, blinking object while on patrol on Highway 69
north, from 1:40 a.m. to 2:20 a.m.
The officers said in a report the object was definitely
not a star and displayed different changing colors.
In Nairn Centre, Theresa Bouillon reported she and her two
sons, Roger, 14 and Claude, 13, saw several objects over
their home between 10 p.m. and midnight Tuesday.
The first object was bright yellow and orange and was seen
in the eastern sky, towards Sudbury.
Later, another object, bright enough to hurt their eyes,
was seen to the east, over Espanola, Mrs. Bouillon said.
She said she called provincial police in Espanola but an
OPP spokesman said no other reports were logged at that
time.
FOUR
AT ONCE
At one point, Mrs. Bouillon said, she and her sons saw a
total of four objects in the sky at once. At midnight because
it was cold and they were frightened they went in to go
to bed.
"It's
the first time I've seen one and I hope it's the last,"
she commented.
A spokesman at CFS Falconbridge had no comment today and
referred The Star to NORAD when questioned about last night's
sightings. In Colorado Springs, Mr. Kindschi said he had
not yet received a report on the Tuesday night sightings.
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 14 November 1975, page 1
NORAD-tracked
UFO was no hoax, says United States expert
By ROB ROWLAND, Star Staff Writer
An unidentified radar blip seen at the same time as Sudbury
regional police saw an unidentified flying object Tuesday
apparently was on the radar screens at CFS Falconbridge
for several hours, The Star has learned. And a top U.S.
civilian authority is convinced the object was "no
hoax."
The U.S. fighter-interceptor sent here were scrambled, a
North American Air Defence command (NORAD) spokesman said,
because the blip was "a persistent phenomenon."
NORAD wouldn't say just how long the blip was visible. The
first police sighting came at 4:50 a.m. and the Falconbridge
personnel saw an object south of the station at 6:15 a.m.
At the same time an object was picked up on radar 30 nautical
miles south of the station, going upward between 42,000
and 72,000 feet.
The last sighting by regional police was about 7:30 a.m.
and almost six hours later at 1:50 p.m. The 171st F-106
squadron of the Michigan Air National Guard was scrambled,
apparently because radar still was tracking the UFO. They
found nothing when they got here.
NO
HOAX
There is still no explanation of what the unidentified object
might be.
Dr. J. Allen Hynek, chairman of the astronomy department
at Chicago's Northwestern University and who heads an official,
U.S. government-sponsored UFO information service, said
what was seen over Sudbury is called a "radar-visual"
UFO, meaning it is picked up on radar and seen visually.
"When
a radar-visual fits a pattern, it's not unusual," Dr.
Hynek said. "But when NORAD confirms something, that
is unusual. It rules out a hoax."
"The
critical thing in the visual sighting is motion," Dr.
Hynek said. "If the UFO doesn't move over a long period,
it is likely the object is a bright star. Both Venus and
Jupiter are very bright right now," he pointed out.
SUSPECTS
PLANET
Dr. Hynek, who vacations each summer in the Blind River
area, said he was aware that there had been interesting
UFO sightings in Sudbury in the past.
Canada's UFO expert, Ian Halliday of the Hertzberg Institute
of Astrophysics at the National Research Council in Ottawa
said what the police officers saw was likely Venus or Jupiter.
"At
this time when the planets are bright in the sky we expect
a lot of UFO sightings and we do get them," Mr. Halliday
said.
Venus rises around 3 a.m. high in the southeast and is still
bright and high in the sky after sunrise, Mr. Halliday said.
Jupiter is also bright and sets about 4:30 a.m. Mars, the
red planet, is getting brighter, he added.
One problem with the reports he received from the Sudbury
Regional Police is that they are too vague to tell if what
the officers saw on Tuesday night are actually Mars, Venus
or Jupiter, he said.
COINCIDENCE
Asked about the sightings on radar, Mr. Halliday said: "As
near as we can tell, it is a coincidence. We have no way
of knowing of any connection between the visual and radar
sightings."
"This
sort of thing is not uncommon on radar. They just happened
to see one at the same time," he added.
The fact police said the UFO lighted up the clouds did not
necessarily rule out stars. Venus can light up thin clouds,
Mr. Halliday said.
|
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 15 November 1975, page 3
Latest
sighting of UFO easily explained Friday
Sudbury Regional Police received a flood of calls reporting
unidentified flying objects over Sudbury about 5:30 p.m.
Friday. All the calls said the UFO was in the southeast.
That UFO, however, turned out to be the planet Jupiter,
which is the first star visible after sunset, at 4:51 p.m.
Regional police sources meanwhile disputed a contention
by National Research Council UFO expert Ian Halliday that
what policemen saw Tuesday morning were the planets Jupiter
and Venus. Police said the objects were too big and too
bright to be a star.
One policeman apparently reported one object was bright enough
to hurt his eyes while another saw one object moving upward,
a motion that tallies with what was seen on the radar screen
at CFS Falconbridge. |
|
Sudbury,
Ontario, STAR, 18 May 1977, page 3
Alaska
radar, pilot spot speedy UFO
ANCHORAGE (AP) - Unidentified flying objects have been reported
over the Chugach Mountains slightly east of here by a Northwest
Orient Airline crew and a radar approach controller at Anchorage
International Airport.
Cliff Cernick, U.S. Federal Aviation Administration (FAA)
spokesman, said Friday that one of the controllers reported
that on April 23 he saw "four blips which gyrated on
his radarscope in an unusual manner."
"The
controller, Terry Siegrest, saw the blips settle downwards,
and then move across the scope at a rapid rate of speed,"
Cernick said.
Siegrest said the objects first appeared about 30 miles
from Anchorage, moving slowly and eventually stopping completely.
When they resumed movement, he said, they picked up speed
and "zipped off to the east."
Harry Fluharty relieved Siegrest after the radar sightings.
He said a Northwest Orient pilot reported that he saw a single
bright object at 60,000 feet moving at a high rate of speed. |
|
|
News clippings courtesy of The Sault Star, The Kirkland
Lake Northern Daily News, The North Bay Nugget and The Sudbury
Star.
|
|
|